Katie Jones's Blog

Katie is from Cedar Rapids, Iowa. She graduated from Grinnell College with a BA in History. She is a second year Master of Public Health student in the Community and Behavioral Health department at the University of Iowa. She works for the MPH Department and for the Iowa Cancer Consortium. She is interested in many public health topics, including health disparities, chronic disease prevention, sexual assault and domestic violence prevention, and health communication. In her spare time, she enjoys cycling and playing board games with friends.

This student blog is unedited and does not necessarily reflect the views of the College of Public Health or the University of Iowa.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Pizza is a Vegetable: Another Example of Corporate Influence on US Politics

You've probably already heard that Congress reclassified the tomato sauce on pizza as a vegetable for school lunches. The phrase "pizza is a vegetable" has even already become an internet meme.















In case you don't know what I'm talking about: basically, Congress blocked proposed changes by the USDA to make school lunches healthier.

As the New York Times reported, "Food companies including ConAgra, Coca-Cola, Del Monte Foods and makers of frozen pizza like Schwan argued that the proposed rules would raise the cost of meals and require food that many children would throw away... The companies called the Congressional response reasonable, adding that the Agriculture Department went too far in trying to improve nutrition in school lunches."

This is a perfect example of the control large companies have over our political system. These big food companies basically bought out Congress to not allow healthier changes to be made - "practical, science-based standards" supported by nutrition experts.

I read the politics section of reddit occasionally, and Tarkaan, a reddit user, wrote something I really agree with: "See, the reason this is offensive and that you should be outraged by it is because nutritionists and scientists guided public policy to improve health and nutrition in children. ConAgra came in and spent a bunch of money, and erased the work that science has done." Tarkaan relates this decision back to Occupy Wall Street and one of the major things the movement is about: protesting the corporate influence on our democratic process.

The Occupy movement has been getting a lot more attention lately, especially after the videos of the police officers pepper spraying UC Davis protesters went viral. Although the videos showing police brutality are disturbing and important, the Occupy movement is about much more than reforming our enforcement practices. Corporate influence and lobbying affect so much, including public health.

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Back from DC!

I got back from the American Public Health Association conference yesterday, which was held in DC this year. The trip was really fun! I still can't get over how great it is that the MPH program and CBH department basically paid for the whole trip (airfare/travel, registration, and hotel); it's definitely pretty wonderful to get the opportunity to DC for free and be around public health leaders.

Like last year's conference (and most conferences in general, I think), some of the sessions were excellent while others were more so-so. I've found that it seems like most of the sessions are very focused on researching health problems, which, while obviously very important, can be a little frustrating if you're working in an implementation/practitioner capacity. It's always great to learn new things though, and it was fun hanging out with other MPH students and one of my coworkers. It was also nice to see DC again (I hadn't been there since I was in elementary school). One of the highlights of the trip was going to Sprinkles, a cupcake shop that has ridiculously good cupcakes! It was also kind of cool to see Occupy DC (which was set up very close to my hotel).




















One of the most amusing things at the conference - an exhibit had ties for sale with disease patterns.

Here are some articles I've read recently that I've thought were interesting:

Native Foster Care: Lost Children, Shatter Families - Laura Sullivan and Amy Walters (NPR)
Absolutely heartbreaking story about how Native American children are disproportionately taken from their homes and put into foster care.

Her Name is Jahessye Shockley. - Francie Latour (The Hyphenated Life) 
A sad and well-written article about how missing white children get way more media attention (and donations) than missing children of color.

The Birth Control Solution - Nicholas D. Kristof (NYT Op-ed)
A simple case for increased birth control. It's hard to argue with this logic, even if you are pro-life.

What's Luck Got To Do With It? - Jim Collins and Morten T. Hansen (NYT essay)
An interesting article on luck and "return on luck."

Informed Patient: A New Push to Prevent Infections in Cancer Patients - WSJ Health Blog 
About the CDC's new campaign and website.

Mammogram's Role of Savior is Tested - Tara Parker-Pope (NYT Well)
Interesting article about mammograms. It seems that recently there's been more discussion on the potential downsides of various cancer screening tests. Even though this article was interesting, I have to say I'm still a big supporter of mammography - it still has been proven to save lives.